Founders running their own ads
You made the creative yourself and want a structured second opinion before you put money behind it.
Ad creative analyzer
CreativeDoctor reviews an image or short video ad against the same ten-part framework every time, then tells you what it saw, why it matters and what to test instead. Here's exactly what it checks and how to read the results.
1 free analysis · No credit card required
You made the creative yourself and want a structured second opinion before you put money behind it.
You need the same review for every new creative, not a fresh opinion each time someone looks at it.
You want findings with the reasoning written down, so they turn straight into a brief.
Most creative feedback is either a gut reaction or a list of generic best practices. Neither tells you which part of a specific ad is holding it back, or what to change first.
Performance data helps, but only after you've spent money, and it rarely says why. A low click-through rate could come from the hook, the offer, the visual or the audience. An ad creative analyzer earns its place when it breaks the ad into parts and assesses each one on its own.
CreativeDoctor applies the same framework to every creative, so a weak hook on one ad means the same thing on the next. That consistency is what makes reports comparable across versions and across your account.
Each area gets its own assessment, observations, likely weakness and one specific recommendation.
Does the first thing people see or read give them a reason to stop? For video, the opening frame is treated as the hook.
Can someone tell what you're selling and what the deal is without guessing?
Is there a clear, specific reason to choose this over doing nothing or buying something else?
Does the eye land on the most important element first, and is the text legible at feed size?
Is the on-image text and ad copy concise and specific, and does it add something the visual doesn't?
Is the next step obvious, and does it suit how ready the audience is to act?
Does the message fit the audience and temperature you entered: cold, warm or retargeting?
Does the ad name a problem the audience actually feels, and how strong is the motivation it creates?
Which objections (price, trust, quality, risk, shipping, fit and more) does the ad address, partly address or leave open?
When you add a URL, does the page continue the ad's promise, offer, price and call to action?
Illustrative examples of the kind of finding a report contains. Every real report is written for the specific ad you upload.
Finding: The headline lists features (“Height-adjustable, 4 memory presets”) before saying what problem the desk solves.
Worth testing: Test a problem-first opening, such as back pain after long workdays, and introduce the desk second.
Finding: The “30% off” badge is the largest element, while the product and what it does are hard to make out at feed size.
Worth testing: Make the product and its main benefit the focal point, and move the discount into the headline.
Finding: Neither the price nor the subscription terms appear anywhere, so the price objection is left for the landing page.
Worth testing: Add a “from $X per serving” line to the copy and test whether it brings better-qualified clicks.
Want to see a complete report? View the example analysis.
A tool that reviews the content of an ad (the image or video, the copy and ideally the landing page) and assesses the parts that influence whether people stop, understand and act. CreativeDoctor uses AI to apply a fixed ten-part framework and turns the findings into ideas to test.
Each of the ten areas gets a 0 to 100 heuristic score from the AI model, based on creative best practice and what's visible in your inputs. Scores help you decide what to look at first. They aren't a prediction of results.
Both are useful. Before launch, it catches unclear offers and weak openings before you spend. After launch, it helps explain an underperforming ad and gives you a next version to test.
Yes. Analyze each version separately. Because every report uses the same framework, you can compare them area by area. Reports are saved to your dashboard.
Facebook and Instagram ads, with primary text, headline and landing page read together.
Short vertical videos reviewed frame by frame, from the opening to the end card.
Review a set of ads with one framework, then find the patterns.
Framework · 4 min read
A practical framework for analyzing any ad creative: hook, offer, value proposition, visual hierarchy, copy, CTA, audience, pain point, objections and landing page.
Testing · 3 min read
A practical ad creative testing checklist: how to pick what to test, write a hypothesis, set up a fair test, read the results and record what you learned.
Hooks · 3 min read
What separates a scroll-stopping Meta ad hook from one people ignore, plus eight hook angles with examples you can adapt for Facebook and Instagram ads.
Your first analysis is free and usually takes a few minutes. No credit card required.